• 20th November, 2025

Norwalk, Connecticut Nov 18, 2025 (Issuewire.com) - Lede: East Village Shoe Repair LLC and designer Boris Zuborev have filed an administrative reconsideration with the U.S. Copyright Office requesting recognition and registration of ornamental shoe design features conceived, prototyped, publicly worn, and documented in New Yorks East Village in 1992. Boris Zuborev and the makers at East Village Shoe Repair are firstgeneration immigrant designers whose work emerged from a culture of resourceful creativity in Manhattans East Village. Drawing on techniques learned across borders and adapted to local materials and streetwear practices, they prototyped, performed services to create for customers, and publicly wore these silhouettes in 1992 as part of a community of artists, performers, and craftsmen. These designs reflect a lived practice of adaptation and craft, a material record of immigrant ingenuity that informed local style long before later massmarket iterations appeared. Historical context: In the late 1980s and early 1990s, immigrant artisans in the East Village transformed thrift and surplus materials into distinct ornamental details and hybrid silhouettes, contributing to a vibrant local design ecology that fed into broader trends. Cultural significance: Recognition of these works acknowledges not only individual authorship but the creative labor of immigrant communities whose contributions are frequently undocumented in corporate histories. Legal relevance: The narrative supports the provenance timeline by establishing consistent, public use and community visibility from the time of conception relevant to administrative reconsideration and media storytelling. Summary Record submitted: original 1992 prototypes; dated photographs; affidavits. Applications this year: 30 filed; registrations granted: 15; pending: 6; withdrawn (rights reserved): 9. Works at stake: Moccasin Sneaker Hybrid; 70s Lux Sole Sneaker; Zipper Closure Sneaker with Faux Eyelets; Faux Fur Sneaker; Knee/ThighHigh SneakerBoot Hybrid; HighHeel Feminized Work Boot. Relief sought: administrative registration and public attribution; negotiated licensing and attribution discussions invited; all legal remedies preserved if administrative relief is not granted. Brand mapping Moccasin Sneaker Hybrid: alleged to share ornamental features with later products marketed as an All Star Moccasin. 70s Lux Sole Sneaker: alleged to share ornamental features with later Chuck 70 De Luxe style variants. Zipper Closure Sneaker with Faux Eyelets: alleged to share ornamental features with later zipclosure sneaker models. Faux Fur Sneaker: alleged to share ornamental features with later fauxfur variants. Knee/ThighHigh SneakerBoot Hybrid: alleged to share ornamental features with later highhi hybrid silhouettes. HighHeel Feminized Work Boot: alleged to share ornamental features with later workboot heel variants. Evidence summary Original physical prototypes dated 1992; dated photographs showing one of the creators present with the designs in the photograph 30 years ago; affidavits from the creators; A copy of the submission to the Copyright Office including the brief with affidavits. Evidence Photos Photo 1 Moccasin Sneaker Hybrid Left: East Village Shoe Repair prototype, 1992. Right: Later product attributed to Converse (decades later). Photo 2 70s Lux Sole Sneaker Left: East Village Shoe Repair prototype, 1992. Right: Later product attributed to Converse Chuck 70 De Luxe Heel/Wedge (decades later). Photo 3 Zipper Closure Sneaker with Faux Eyelets Photograph available upon request. Photo 4 Faux Fur Sneaker Left: East Village Shoe Repair prototype, 1992. Right: Later fauxfur variant attributed to Converse (decades later). Photo 5 Knee/Thigh High Sneaker Boot Hybrid with Faux Laces and Zipper Closure Left: East Village Shoe Repair prototype, 1992. Right: Later product attributed to Converse (decades later). Photo 6 HighHeel Feminized Work Boot Left: East Village Shoe Repair prototype, 1992. Right: Later product attributed to Timberland (decades later). Legal posture The reconsideration asks the U.S. Copyright Office to apply Star Athletica v. Varsity Brands consistently and to grant registration where ornamental elements satisfy the minimal creativity and separability standards. Applicants seek negotiated attribution and licensing outcomes and reserve all remedies available under law if administrative relief is not granted. Legal Argument and Office Error The legal argument is that each shoe contains original ornamental features that meet the Supreme Courts twostep separability test from Star Athletica: the contested elements are perceptible as pictorial, graphic, or sculptural works separate from the shoes utilitarian functions and could exist independently in another medium, and the record (dated photographs, preserved samples, and affidavits) establishes independent creation and the modicum of creativity required by Feist; Bleistein and Mazer confirm that artistic judgment in applied art is protectable; Satava, Boisson, and Alfred Bell support protection for original selections and arrangements of familiar elements; and Nimmers triviality doctrine is a narrow exception that does not apply here. The Offices error is procedural and analytical: the examiner explicitly found the contested features have sculptural qualities and could be conceptually removed and imagined in another medium, which are precisely the factual predicates Star Athletica requires, yet the rejection concludes there are no separable, copyrightable features. That internal contradiction admitting both prongs of separability in fact but denying copyrightability in conclusion misapplies controlling precedent and treats cumulative, authored arrangements as trivial despite established case law recognizing that coordinated, original combinations of ordinary elements are protectable. Media access and verification Credentialed reporters may request sidebyside comparative images, the affidavits and the briefs filed with the Copyright Office by emailing [email protected]. Requests must include publication name, reporter full name, and press credentials. Responses will be provided within 48 business hours. Inperson review of original prototyped shoes crafted in the early 1990s require a scheduled appointment. Quotes Boris Zuborev, Designer: These silhouettes were prototyped and publicly worn in 1992; we ask that the record reflect that origin. Eugene Finkelberg, Collaborator: When ornamental artistry is original and distinct, copyright should protect grassroots creators. Call to industry East Village Shoe Repair invites Converse (Nike) and Timberland to engage in goodfaith discussions about attribution and equitable remedies while the administrative reconsideration proceeds. Disclaimer This press release contains allegations and factual statements made by the applicants. Nothing in this release constitutes an admission of liability, a waiver of any rights, or a complete statement of all facts or defenses. The parties expressly reserve all rights and remedies under law. About East Village Shoe Repair LC Founded in Manhattans East Village in the late 1980s, East Village Shoe Repair is a workshop and design studio specializing in custom footwear, experimental silhouettes, and repairascreation. The shops ornamental detailing was prototyped and publicly worn in the early 1990s and remains central to its creative mission. Contact Law Offices of Mark M. Kratter, LLC Email: [email protected] | Phone: 2038532312 71 East Avenue, Suite K, Norwalk, CT 06851 SOCIAL Follow the work and original designs on Instagram: @eastvillageshoerepair_bk for rapid updates, behindthescenes looks, and exclusive previews. End Media ContactZubo, [email protected] East Avenue, Suite K, Norwalk, CT 06851https://[email protected] Source :NoneThis article was originally published by IssueWire. Read the original article here.